Legal Opinion
Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1948No. 10548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This suit originated as a petition for declaratory judgment instituted against appellee, assignee of Mayo patent No. 2,322, 041, by appellant, assignee of Sperry patent No. 2,353,274, asking that the court declare the right of appellant to manufacture cer*963tam specified automobile heaters without interference from the appellee, and hold the Mayo patent invalid, or not infringed. The appellee in its answer and counterclaim asserted the validity of Mayo, and alleged infringment of the Mayo patent by appellant. The District Court held Mayo patent No. 2,322,041, for automobile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hess v. DreyfussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Rousso v. First Nat. Bank in DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Sperry v. AufieroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. The Bishop and Babcock Manufacturing Company, the Bishop and Babcock Manufacturing Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.