Legal Opinion

Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 22, 1949No. Civ. No. 23354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This was an action for a declaratory judgment as to certain patents. On June 10, 1947, this Court entered judgment for defendant, except as to one claim of the patent owned by defendant which was held to be invalid. The judgment also awarded defendant damages on its counterclaim “together with costs, interest and reasonable attorneys’ fees.”

Plaintiff appealed the case and on March 3, 1948, the Court of Appeals, 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 962, 968, held that: “The judgment of the District Court is reversed as to claim No. 6 of Mayo Patent 2,322,041. In all other respects the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eagle Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  2. Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API