Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1950No. 10835PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of a judgment of the District Court finding three claims of Turnham patent 2,242,408, issued May 20, 1941, on an application filed October 28, 1938, valid and infringed. Weingarten, plaintiff below, is assignee of the patent in which Bradley, co-plaintiff below, owned a nominal interest.
At the trial it was stipulated that Claims 4, 5 and 6, if valid, were infringed by appellant’s structure. Appellees then withdrew Claims 1, 2 and 3, and hence Claims 4, 5 and 6, printed in the margin, are in issue.1
*637The Turnham patent covers a merchandise handler,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Faulkner v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jamco, Incorporated, an Oklahoma Corporation, and A. D. Willkinson v. Theodore F. Carlson, and Carlson Manufacturing Co., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Oriental Foods, Inc. v. Chun King Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. St. Joe Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.