Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MICROSOFT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A NEW TRIAL WITH A REMITTITUR
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
This case is on remand from the Federal Circuit for a new trial on damages for Microsoft’s infringement of claims 19 and 21 of U.S. Patent Number 4,763,356 (“Day patent”). See Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., 580 F.3d 1301 (Fed.Cir.2009). The first jury returned a finding of 'infringement and validity of the Day patent, and Microsoft appealed the verdict and damages award. -See id. The Federal Circuit…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Numatics, Inc. v. Balluff, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Talent Mobile Dev., Inc. v. Headios Grp.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- San Diego Comic Convention, Non-Profit Corp. v. Dan Farr Prods.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Mark Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025