Legal Opinion

Jenson v. Puste

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2010No. Docket No. 292731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. F. Kelly, J.

Defendant, Paul Puste, appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying his motion for entry of a consent order to vacate a personal protection order (PPO) nunc pro tunc1 and to seal the court file pursuant to MCR 8.119(F). Resolution of this matter requires us to determine whether a trial court has the authority to seal a PPO pursuant to MCR 8.119(F). The trial court held that it did not, and we agree. We hold that under the plain language of MCR 8.119(F)(5), a court is prohibited from sealing court orders and court opinions. We affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS

The parties to this action were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Green v. ZiegelmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Decker v. Trux R US, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. McCracken v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In re Guardianship of A.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. Decker v. Trux R US, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API