Jenson v. Puste
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtK. F. Kelly, J.
Defendant, Paul Puste, appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying his motion for entry of a consent order to vacate a personal protection order (PPO) nunc pro tunc1 and to seal the court file pursuant to MCR 8.119(F). Resolution of this matter requires us to determine whether a trial court has the authority to seal a PPO pursuant to MCR 8.119(F). The trial court held that it did not, and we agree. We hold that under the plain language of MCR 8.119(F)(5), a court is prohibited from sealing court orders and court opinions. We affirm.
I. BASIC FACTS
The parties to this action were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Green v. ZiegelmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Decker v. Trux R US, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- McCracken v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Guardianship of A.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Decker v. Trux R US, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019