Decker v. Trux R US, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*474RIORDAN, P.J.
In this garnishment action, plaintiffs, James and Kay Decker, appeal as of right orders denying their motion to extend discovery and granting summary disposition in favor of garnishee defendant, Auto Owners Insurance Company. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In October 2007, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against defendant, Trux R Us, Inc., arising out of injuries plaintiff James Decker sustained at a construction site when he was run over by a bulldozer.
In May 2008, Auto Owners, the insurer for Trux R Us, brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a judgment that it had no duty to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Dykes v. William Beaumont HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nancy Sanders v. McLaren-macombMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Casa Bella Landscaping, LLC v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Heidi Marie Gumbleton v. Village of HollyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Kickham Hanley Pllc v. Oakland County MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Nancy Sanders v. McLaren-macombMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.