McCracken v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition. The trial court found that plaintiffs had effectively “admitted” defendants’ affirmative defenses when failing to specifically deny them in a timely manner, particularly after defendants had demanded a response to the affirmative defenses. We hold that affirmative defenses are not pleadings requiring a response under MCR 2.110(A) and (B). Moreover, we hold that affirmative defenses are to be taken as denied even if they include a demand for a response. Accordingly, we reverse the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hill v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mericka v. Department of Community HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Richmond Township v. ErbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tyra v. Organ Procurement AgencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Prins v. Michigan State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Chester Tripp III v. Carrie BakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
- Dbd Kazoo LLC v. Western Michigan LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.