Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 1, 1988No. 82, 107, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In this opinion we shall consider the cases of petitioner Michael Wardell Stanley (Stanley) and of appellant Clarence Haywood Trice a/k/a Benjamin Edward Chester (Trice). Both are members of the black race. Each was convicted at trial by substantially or totally white juries after most or all potential jurors who were black were excluded from jury service by peremptory challenges used by a State prosecutor. The two cases thus present a common question: did the procedures used by the State violate the prohibition against racially discriminatory jury selection explained in Batson…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hatten v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API