United States v. Jerome G. Cook
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TURRENTINE, District Judge:
Cook was arraigned and pleaded not guilty along with his co-defendant, one Segal, on August 21, 1972. Representing Cook was his retained counsel, Mr. Schwartz. A trial date of October 10 was set.
On October 10, attorney Schwartz requested a continuance in order that Cook might obtain different counsel, citing “irreconcilable differences” which had arisen between attorney and client regarding primarily trial tactics and strategy. The court, citing the nearly two months which had passed since the arraignment, denied coúnsel’s request for a continuance. The court did,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Dukes v. Warden, Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Robert MichaelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Fernando Novelo NostratisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Roberto Navarro-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. UlanoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1979
- United States v. Esther B. KahutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.