Legal Opinion
United States v. Esther B. Kahut
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-30347Published
1Opinion of the Court
59 F.3d 176
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Esther B. KAHUT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-30347.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 6, 1995.*
Decided June 12, 1995.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ramon Rios-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Clifford K. KennellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sumecht Na, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.