Legal Opinion

United States v. Ulano

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 23, 1979No. CR. 76-1382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA OF GUILTY

BREWSTER, District Judge, By Designation.

The one count indictment in this case charges that the defendants, Bernard Ulano, Harry Franklin Ridgeway and others not identified, illegally conspired to distribute cocaine, a schedule II narcotic drug controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Each defendant, represented by his own employed counsel, pleaded guilty to the charge against him and was sentenced to a term in prison, to be followed by a statutory special parole term. Ridgeway accepted his sentence; Ulano is contesting his. Prior to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. People v. RatliffIllinois Supreme Court · 2024
  3. United States v. Bernard UlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API