Legal Opinion

Dorton v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 22, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

The case of Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. Dorton, 300 Ky. 385, 189 S. W. 2d 394, presents a full discussion of the controversy between the parties to this appeal. In that case Dorton predicated his cause of action upon the express terms of an alleged contract under which he permitted the Company to use a device he had invented for repressuring oil wells. The contract, which was signed only by Dorton, recited no consideration and, on its face, tended to show it was only a license to permit the Company to use his invention. He offered proof,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pieck v. CarranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  2. Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. DortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Pieck v. CarranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Furtula v. University of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2003
  3. Beaver v. OakleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. King v. Ohio Valley Terminix Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Gill v. WallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API