Pieck v. Carran
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Reversing.
On the first appeal of this case (271 Ky. 32, 111 S. W. (2d) 440, 442), parties were respectively defendant and plaintiff, and occupied like positions on the second trial.4 It is not necessary for us to restate the facts or conclusions of law, except insofar as they may be pertinent. We reversed the first judgment for reasons clearly set out in the opinion, and remanded for “proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
When our mandate, which followed the language of our opinion, was filed, appellant moved the court to set aside the former…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schrodt's v. SchrodtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Preece v. WoolfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Schrodt's v. SchrodtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Collins v. Lemaster's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Deason & Keith v. RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aetna Oil Co. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Dorton v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Hutson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
- Coleman v. Campbell Cnty. Library Bd. of Trs.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- Society of Alumni of Louisville Male High School, Inc. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952