Thompson v. Nebraska Mobile Homes Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison
Plaintiff, Neoma Thompson, appeals the decision of the Eight Judicial District Court of Montana to dismiss her claim of strict liability in tort against defendants. It was dismissed because the only injury suffered by plaintiff was to the product itself, the mobile home. We reverse the decision of the District Court and hola that a strict liability action can lie when the only damage suffered is to the defective product itself.
Neoma Thompson purchased a 1972 Magnolia Futurama from Arnold Kruse, d/b/a American Ideal Homes, and Jack Boles on September 25,1971. She paid $8,465.00 for the mobile…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- City of La Crosse v. Schubert, Schroeder & Associates, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ew v. DchMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- E.W. v. D.C.H.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- McJunkin v. Kaufman & Broad Home Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.