Legal Opinion
United States v. Horacio Yuman-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 8, 2013No. 11-50219PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODWIN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Horacio Antonio Yuman-Hernandez appeals his 180-month statutory mandatory-minimum sentence, assigning error to the district court’s rejection of his sentencing entrapment argument. He argued a lack of predisposition to commit an offense involving the amount of cocaine charged, and was thus entrapped. The sentence is affirmed.
I. BACKGROUND
After a bench trial, Yuman-Hernandez was convicted of charges arising from a conspiracy to rob a cocaine stash house and the use of a firearm. As part of a reverse sting operation targeting home-invasion crews, an Alcohol,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Mark William Paul StauferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael Floyd Barth, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lorenzo NaranjoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Tony SiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Quinn v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Cordae BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jorge CortesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.