Legal Opinion

United States v. Hudson

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 10, 2014No. Case No. 2:13-cr-00126-ODW-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT [92]

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

“ ‘Lead us not into temptation,’ ” Judge Noonan warned. United States v. Black, 733 F.3d 294, 313 (9th Cir.2013) (Noonan, J., dissenting). But into temptation the Government has gone, ensnaring chronically unemployed individuals from poverty-ridden areas in its fake drug stash-house robberies. While undoubtedly a valid law-enforcement tool when employed to target or prevent demonstrated criminal enterprises, reverse stings offend the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Daryle SellersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. ColonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  3. United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. United States v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API