United States v. Hudson
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT [92]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
“ ‘Lead us not into temptation,’ ” Judge Noonan warned. United States v. Black, 733 F.3d 294, 313 (9th Cir.2013) (Noonan, J., dissenting). But into temptation the Government has gone, ensnaring chronically unemployed individuals from poverty-ridden areas in its fake drug stash-house robberies. While undoubtedly a valid law-enforcement tool when employed to target or prevent demonstrated criminal enterprises, reverse stings offend the United States Constitution…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Daryle SellersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ColonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.