Teleco, Inc. v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
Three issues are presented for decision: [1] Did the Corporation Commission order violate policies of the Federal Communications Commission? [2] Does the order unconstitutionally discriminate against those Southwestern Bell customers who use their own telephone equipment? and [8] Was there substantial evidence to support the Commission’s allowance of a BO<h credit rate to subscribers with privately-owned terminal equipment? We answer the first two questions in the negative and the last one in the affirmative.
In its application to the Corporation Commission [Commission]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- C. F. Braun & Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Tecumseh Gas System, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Turpen v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Henry v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.