Legal Opinion

Teleco, Inc. v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1982No. 51961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

Three issues are presented for decision: [1] Did the Corporation Commission order violate policies of the Federal Communications Commission? [2] Does the order unconstitutionally discriminate against those Southwestern Bell customers who use their own telephone equipment? and [8] Was there substantial evidence to support the Commission’s allowance of a BO<h credit rate to subscribers with privately-owned terminal equipment? We answer the first two questions in the negative and the last one in the affirmative.

In its application to the Corporation Commission [Commission]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. C. F. Braun & Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Tecumseh Gas System, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Turpen v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Henry v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API