Legal Opinion

Scott v. Ætna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdbN, J.

If a tooth is extracted, upon request of the insured, by a competent and skillful dentist, who performs the operation in the usual and ordinary manner, with proper and sterile instruments, employing the requisite degree of care and skill, and thereafter an embolus develops from infection, producing death, can the beneficiary recover double indemnity provided in a policy of insurance for such death resulting “directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means,” etc. ?

Undoubtedly the insured met an accidental…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Mehaffey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Harris v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Brown v. Carolina Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Fletcher v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API