State v. Keller
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Julian Keller appeals a district court judgment after a jury found him guilty of driving under the influence. Concluding the district court properly admitted Keller’s chemical blood test, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In June 2012, Keller was charged with driving under the influence. At the jury trial, the State introduced exhibit 1, which included a statement from a forensic scientist assigned by the State Toxicologist certifying that the State Toxicologist-approved steps were taken in analyzing Keller’s blood sample. Exhibit 1 also included the top portion of Form 104 with a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Filkowski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Korb v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Keller v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Van ZomerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. GackleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.