Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where a corporation engaged in the business of canning sea-food and owning fishing boats pursued the policy of equipping the boats with fishing nets, ice, gas, and oil, and turning the boats over to persons called “captains,»” and where the captains, under contract with that corporation, went out on fishing expeditions in navigable waters near the shore, each with the assistance of another person called a helper, employed and paid by the captain, and caught shrimp and prawn which were brought back in the boat to the plant of the canning company and were there delivered to the employees of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Irving v. Home Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Travelers Insurance v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Souter v. CravyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Howard v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PixlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Southern Shell Fish Co., Inc. v. PlaisanceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Williams Packing & Navigation Co. v. EnochsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1959
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930