Legal Opinion

Howard v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1924No. 15237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A cropper is one wlio works for wages payable in part of the crop produced, and is a laborer, and, as such, may maintain a laborer’s lien upon the crop as the property of his employer. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3705, 3707, 3334, 3335; McElmurray v. Turner, 86 Ga. 215 (12 S. E. 359); Lewis v. Owens, 124 Ga. 228 (52 S. E. 333); Faircloth v. Webb, 125 Ga. 230 (53 S. E. 592); Garrick v. Jones, 2 Ga. App. 382.

2. A laborer who is entitled to the earnings of his wife.and minor child may assert a lien in his own name and for his own use for labor contracted for and performed by them. McElmurray v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElmurray v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Cox v. Adams & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Faircloth v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Lewis v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Garrick v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pavlis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Kelley v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Potter v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Whitworth v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API