Legal Opinion

Souter v. Cravy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1923No. 13722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The fundamental distinction between the relationships of landlord and cropper and landlord and tenant is in the fact that the status of cropper is that of a laborer who has agreed to work for and under the landlord' for a certain proportion of the crop as wages, but who does not thereby acquire any dominion or control over the premises upon which such labor is to be performed, the cropper having the right merely to enter and remain thereupon for the purpose of performing his engagement; whereas a tenant does not occupy the status of a laborer, but under such a contract acquires possession,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellis, McKinnon & Brown v. HoppsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Marshall v. AveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Thornton v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Barnesville Bank v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API