Legal Opinion
Kotlar v. Hartford Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 2000No. B133614PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, Acting P. J.
In this action for breach of contract and negligence, plaintiff Jack Kotlar appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants after the trial court sustained a demurrer to his third amended complaint without leave to amend further. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court with directions.
Facts and Proceedings Below
In substance, the complaint alleges as follows:
Jack Kotlar leased commercial property on Pico Boulevard in Los Angeles to Meir Sharvit doing business as Meir Produce (Meir). Under the lease Meir agreed to maintain liability insurance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Charnay v. CobertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brehm v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.