Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Land

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1918No. 9185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error- from District Court, Hughes County ; Geo. C. Crump, Judge. Action by M. M. Land against James W. Lusk and others, receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgement for plaintiff, motion for new trial denied, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

This action was begun by- the defendant in error, M. M. Land, plaintiff below, against James W. Lusk, W. C. Nixon, and W. B. Biddle, receivers of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover damages alleged to be due plaintiff by reason of having been ejected from one of defendant’s passenger trains.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The petition charges that on the 7th day of August, 1910, the plaintiff purchased a ticket from the defendants th-at entitled him to ride on defendants’ train from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. YountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Tetirick, Gdn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API