St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Henry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge. Action bv Mollie Henry against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation. Judgment "for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, C.
This is an action by the defendant in.error, who will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, which will hereinafter be referred to as defendant, to recover $952.50 damages on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant in putting the plaintiff off its train at a place called Hightower’s Switch, instead of vHtus, her proper destination, and the place to which she had purchased a ticket.
The material facts as they appear from the evidence, briefly stated, are: That on July 19, 1910, the plaintiff purchased a round-trip ticket for herself from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trigg v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. FlaggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Willson v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. HoldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitworth v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Lusk v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918