Legal Opinion

Ferreira v. Quik Stop Markets, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1983No. Civ. 49817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BREINER, J. *

In February 1974, plaintiffs Robert and Kristen Ferreira, husband and wife, purchased a franchise to operate a Quik Stop Market, a con venience grocery and gasoline store. In October 1975, they brought suit against Quik Stop Markets, Inc., the franchisor, seeking damages under several theories: intentional and negligent misrepresentation, breach of the franchise agreement and violation of the Franchise Investment Law. Quik Stop, in turn, cross-complained against the plaintiffs for breach of the franchise agreement. At the conclusion of a lengthy trial, the jury found that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Mesecher v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. English v. Mei Fhu LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. De Vera v. Long Beach Public Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Ford v. BennackaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API