Legal Opinion
Dufour v. Seymour
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1929No. Docket No. 7004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
[1] The testimony in the above-entitled matter seems to present a substantial conflict upon the question of whether or not the petitioner was injured in the course of his employment; and in that state of the record the finding of the respondent commission is controlling. The application for the writ is, therefore, denied upon that ground.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Lepori v. HilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- National City Bank v. ParrIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Pan-American Bank v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930