Legal Opinion

Dufour v. Seymour

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1929No. Docket No. 7004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] The testimony in the above-entitled matter seems to present a substantial conflict upon the question of whether or not the petitioner was injured in the course of his employment; and in that state of the record the finding of the respondent commission is controlling. The application for the writ is, therefore, denied upon that ground.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lepori v. HilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. National City Bank v. ParrIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Pan-American Bank v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930