Legal Opinion

McHone v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 16, 1975No. 7327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge.

This is a diversity action in which plaintiff Ronald McHone, a minor (who was two years of age at the time pertinent herein), seeks damages for personal injuries suffered on an escalator in defendant Montgomery Ward & Company’s store in Portsmouth, Ohio. Ronald’s father, Horace McHone, has already sued Montgomery Ward and the escalator manufacturer, Haughton-Peele Corporation, in state court (Scioto County Court of Common Pleas) for loss of his son’s services and for medical expenses. In the state action, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Ronald’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. De La CruzOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API