Legal Opinion

United States v. One Cadillac Town Automobile

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 16, 1932No. 13144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The government seeks forfeiture of the automobile in issue under the Tariff Act, title 19, USCA, §§ 275, 276, also sections 482 and 483. Section 482 grants the power of search; section 483 provides forfeiture of automobile, etc., used in conveying narcotics, etc., and, likewise, penalty for driver to refuse to stop for search and examination,'ete. The seizure in issue was made by the Collector of Customs in harmony with section 605, Tariff Act 1939 (19 USCA § 1605), and the automobile is in his custody. The narcotic in issue is prohibited from importation. Section…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924
  5. United States v. One 1920 Premier AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1937 Hudson Terraplane Coupé Automobile, Motor No. 285062, Serial No. 701773District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937
  2. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932
  3. Mosehart & Keller Automobile Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API