Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Carr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Christian Circuit Court. — Eon. John T. Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The purported printed abstract of the record filed in this court is wholly insufficient. The purported abstract of the record copies the pleadings, some excerpts from the testimony, a motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment, two instructions of which complaint is made, but there is nothing to show that the bill of exceptions contained any of these things of which the appellant now complains. The only thing in the purported abstract of the record which giyes us any information that a bill of exceptions was eyer filed at all is the following:

“admissions.-’-’
“It is admitted that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. BedollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Whiting v. Big River Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Clements v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Vandeventer v. GossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Bank of Willow Springs v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API