Bank of Willow Springs v. Smith
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Douglas Circuit Court.— Eon. John T. Moore, Judge. (1) Appellants have not filed in this court an abstract such as is required by the rules of this court, and the statutes and laws of the state. R. S. 1909', secs. 2048, 2051; Novinger & Son v. Railroad, 131 Mo. App. 337; Cross v. Henderson, 1291 Mo. App. 537; Clay v. Publishing Co., 200 Mo. 665 ; Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625; Greenwood v. Parlin & Orendorff Co., 98 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Douglas Circuit Court.— Eon. John T. Moore, Judge. (1) Appellants have not filed in this court an abstract such as is required by the rules of this court, and the statutes and laws of the state. R. S. 1909', secs. 2048, 2051; Novinger & Son v. Railroad, 131 Mo. App. 337; Cross v. Henderson, 1291 Mo. App. 537; Clay v. Publishing Co., 200 Mo. 665 ; Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625; Greenwood v. Parlin & Orendorff Co., 98 Mo. App. 407; Harris v. Wilson, 199 Mo. 412; Brand v. Cannon, 118 Mo. 595; Ely v. Coontz, 167 Mo. 371; Banks v. Hutton, 224 Mo. 52.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace in Douglas county, October 7, 1908. by filing with the justice a promissory note. The defendants obtained a judgment before the justice, and plaintiff appealed. The trial in the circuit court also resulted in a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appealed to this court.
The defendants challenge the sufficiency of plaintiff’s abstract of the record, and claim that on account of the defects therein, matters of exception are not before us for review. The abstract does not show that any bill of exceptions was filed. The only reference to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jenkins v. Shannon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Thompson v. CarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910