Legal Opinion

People v. Elliott

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1993No. E009536PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by jury of one count of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (b))—attended by a true finding (the truth of which had been admitted by defendant) that he had suffered a prior conviction of a serious felony within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a).

On appeal, defendant raises only one contention: The trial court erred prejudicially by refusing to instruct the jury, at defendant’s request, as to the asserted lesser related offense of being an accessory (either to a robbery or to a “lesser included” grand theft). We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. DutyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. People v. ParteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Smith v. Novato Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API