People v. Elliott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by jury of one count of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (b))—attended by a true finding (the truth of which had been admitted by defendant) that he had suffered a prior conviction of a serious felony within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a).
On appeal, defendant raises only one contention: The trial court erred prejudicially by refusing to instruct the jury, at defendant’s request, as to the asserted lesser related offense of being an accessory (either to a robbery or to a “lesser included” grand theft). We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. DutyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. ParteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. Novato Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.