People v. Beeman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
Timothy Mark Beeman appeals from a judgment of conviction of robbery, burglary, false imprisonment, destruction of telephone equipment and assault with intent to commit a felony (Pen. Code, §§211, 459, 236, 591, 221). Appellant was not present during commission of the offenses. His conviction rested on the theory that he aided and abetted his acquaintances James Gray and Michael Burk.
The primary issue before us is whether the standard California Jury Instructions (CALJIC Nos. 3.00 and 3.01) adequately inform the jury of the *551criminal intent required to convict a defendant as…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by506 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
501 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.