Legal Opinion
Airday v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 17, 2015No. 14 Civ. 8065PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants the City of New York (“the City”),' Keith Sehwam (“Schwam”) and David Frankel (“Frankel”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the Complaint of plaintiff George Airday (“Airday” or the “Plaintiff”) alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Plaintiff’s claims arise out of the denial of renewal of his five-year term as New York City Marshall in alleged retaliation for his criticism of a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chizman v. ScarnatiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Airday v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Airday v. The City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Alexander v. Central Islip School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Doe v. Salina, Jr.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.