Legal Opinion
Chizman v. Scarnati
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 2, 2016No. 14-CV-5910 (JS)(AKT)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Harold Chizman (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action against defendants Michael Scarnati (“Scarnati”) and Robert Karolkowski (“Karolkowski” and, collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Defs.’ Mot., Docket Entry 47.) For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background1
Plaintiff was born in 1950. (Defs.’ 56.1 Stmt., Docket Entry 48, ¶…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alexander v. Central Islip School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Harry v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Lebowitz v. The New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Lepino v. Town/Village of HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Mackenzie v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.