Airday v. City of N.Y.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Sweet, D.J.
Defendants the City of New York (the "City"), Keith Schwam ("Schwam") and David Frankel ("Frankel") (collectively, the "Defendants") have moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing the Amended Complaint ("AC") of plaintiff George Airday ("Airday" or the "Plaintiff") alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Based on the facts and conclusions which follow, the motion of the Defendants is granted in part and denied in part, and the First…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LEMIRE ASSOCIATES v. HOWMET AEROSPACE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- PSC Industries, Inc. v. Yarbrough Technical Associates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022