Newell v. Loeb
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered December 14, 1912, upon verdicts of a jury awarding damages and assessing benefits in condemnation proceedings to establish a waterway district.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This is an eminent domain and special assessment proceeding, prosecuted by the commissioners of Waterway District No. 1, of King county, Washington, under the provisions of ch. 11, Laws 1911, p. 11 (3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 8166a et seq.), for the purpose of acquiring the right of way for the straightening and deepening of the channel of the Duwamish river, in King county. Thirteen thousand parties are named as defendants. Against some of these defendants, it is sought to take certain of their property for the right of way. Against others, it is sought to determine the maximum special benefits…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Seattle & Montana Railroad v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Tacoma v. Nisqually Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
- Hill v. NewellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Davis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Harris v. Hylebos Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.