Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. "Wiseman Macdonald, and Thomas P. Higgins, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to recover damages from defendant for injuries caused to a building, the property of plaintiff. The damage was caused by an explosion of gas. This explosion occurred in a restaurant of a tenant of the plaintiff, Cressaty by name. The facts attending the explosion have recently been set forth by this court in its consideration of the case of Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas and Electric Company, 158 Cal. 499, [139 Am. St. Rep. 134, 111 Pac. 534]. It is sufficient to refer to that case, hut it is to be borne in mind that that action was for personal injuries occasioned to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- J. B. White & Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Smoketree-Lake Murray, Ltd. v. Mills Concrete Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.