Finkeldey v. Omnibus Cable Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. Sanperson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff was injured in attempting to board a car of the defendant at the corner of San Bruno road and Army street, in San Francisco, and brought this action to recover damages therefor, alleging that the injury was caused through the negligence of the defendant “in failing to bring said car to a full and sufficient stop at the time plaintiff was boarding *30said car for the purpose aforesaid, and in failing to provide said car with guards as required by law.” The circumstances connected with the injury are detailed in his testimony as follows: “When the car came along, and was about thirty…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Schepers v. Union Depot RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Eppendorf v. . B.C. and N.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Carr v. River & Eureka RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Hanton v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Tecker v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Garvey v. Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
- Eikenberry v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.