Legal Opinion

Hanton v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1918No. L. A. No. 4583. Department TwoPublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. The case was twice tried before a jury, the first trial resulting in a mistrial; the second, in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff appeals from both this judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial. The accident in which plaintiff was permanently injured by being run over by one of the cars of the defendant which he was endeavoring to board occurred in the city of Venice, Los Angeles County.

The grounds urged for a reversal are that the evidence was insufficient to justify a verdict for defendant; that the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bierbach v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Peterson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Wastl v. Montana Union RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Finkeldey v. Omnibus Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Waer v. WaerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API