Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Higgins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 55 and 56PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

These appeals are from the refusal of the court below to strike cf. two judgments entered against Catherine Higgins alone and against Edward Higgins and Catherine Higgins, his wife, appellants.

On October 19, 1953, Edward Higgins contracted for the installation of an oil burner and storage tank in the property of his wife at 5601 Pine Street at a price of $268. This work was performed by October 31, 1953. On October 26, 1953, the appellant husband again contracted with appellee, covering the same property, for repairs to the water system at an agreed price of $131.75.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lacock v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  2. Taylor v. Tudor & FreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. FairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Hughes v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Field Enterprises Educational Corp. v. GolattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Jim Dolan Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. v. Keefer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API