Doerr v. Graybill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 215, Oct. T., 1902, by plaintiff, from orders of C. P. Lancaster Co., April T., 1902, No. 75, making absolute a rule to dissolve attachment and discharging rule to amend in case of Regina Doerr v. George Graybill and Wife. Rule to dissolve attachment. Rule to amend. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were the orders of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Smith, J.,
On September 17,1898, a transcript of a judgment entered July 26, 1898, by J. B. Kreckel, an alderman, certified on September 13,1898, was filed in the common pleas, the judgment being in favor of Regina Doerr, against “ George Graybill and wife.” On April 8, 1902, a paper of the following tenor, signed by the alderman, was filed in the common pleas : “ Mrs. Regina Doerr v. George Graybill and Mary Graybill (his wife). In the above suit I certify that there was judgment entered July 26, 1898, for plaintiff, in the sum of $79.64 and costs. April 7, 1902, execution issued,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lacock v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
- King v. NimickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Littster v. LittsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Boyd v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Smith v. WehrlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Taylor v. Tudor & FreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Mamlin v. Tener (Et Ux.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Shotts Co. v. Agnew, and BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- First National Bank v. FairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Hirsch v. SamulanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.