Legal Opinion

Director General of Railroads v. Birdsboro Stone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1925No. Appeal 19PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action to recover the lawful freight charges on an interstate shipment of goods. The statement of plaintiff’s cause of action averred and the affidavit of defense admitted that the defendant delivered to the plaintiff at Monocaey, Pennsylvania, a large quantity of crushed stone, which was loaded in eleven cars and consigned to Manwaring & Cummins, Princeton Junction, New Jersey, and the bill of lading named the defendant as the shipper. The stone was transported by the plaintiff and delivered to the consignees at Princeton Junction, New Jersey. The freight rate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Whitney & KemmererSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Taylor v. Tudor & FreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Collins & Timberlake v. Union Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. General Crushed Stone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. v. Western Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1954
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Stouck-Reaser Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API