Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. Duff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2006No. Civil Action 04-2209 (RMC)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sharon Hollingsworth developed sick-building syndrome while working as a computer programmer in the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building. During a period of declining health surrounding this diagnosis, her employer, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (“AOUSC”), permitted her to work from home, but ultimately eliminated her position and terminated her, claiming that any alternative positions would require her presence in the Marshall Building, which her health precluded. Ms. Hollingsworth filed an administrative complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Digital Healthcare, Inc. v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sledge v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.