Legal Opinion
Cascade Development Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 7, 1987No. 342-86LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*588OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This action comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. The dispositive issue is whether plaintiff’s claim is time-barred by the statute of limitations.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Cascade Development Company, Inc. (Cascade), is the owner of patented mining claims located in Sections 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of Township 24 North, Range 13 E.W.M., King County, Washington, commonly known as the Dutch Miller Mine. The mine is located eight miles from an accessible road in a remote high…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Tobacco and Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corporation, Howard S. CullmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Benenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Economic Development & Industrial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Leeth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Cascade Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Cascade Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Cascade Development Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988