Legal Opinion
Cascade Development Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 3, 1993No. 342-86LPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIDWELL, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion.
FACTS
The court has set out the factual context of this dispute in earlier orders. See Cascade Dev. Co. v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 651, vacated, 861 F.2d 729 (Fed.Cir.1988); Cascade Dev. Co. v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 587 (1987), vacated, 838 F.2d 1222 (Fed.Cir.1988). Since the court’s last published order, and pursuant to the September 26, 1988, order of the United States Court of Appeals for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cascade Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Cascade Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988