Heidbrink v. Schaffner
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal frbm St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Hugo Muench, Judge. (1) The demurrers to the evidence offered by appellants should have been sustained. Dinsmore v. Livingston Co., 60 Mo. 244; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 489, S. C. .153 Id. 497; Chapman v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 547; Howard County v. Baker, 119 Mo. 407; Mc-Gregor v. Construction Co., 188 Mo. 623; Roy v. Boteler, 40 Mo. App. 222; Eldridge v. Fuhr, 59 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal frbm St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Hugo Muench, Judge. (1) The demurrers to the evidence offered by appellants should have been sustained. Dinsmore v. Livingston Co., 60 Mo. 244; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 489, S. C. .153 Id. 497; Chapman v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 547; Howard County v. Baker, 119 Mo. 407; Mc-Gregor v. Construction Co., 188 Mo. 623; Roy v. Boteler, 40 Mo. App. 222; Eldridge v. Fuhr, 59 Mo. App. 49; International, etc., Co. v. Biefeld, 173 Ill. 185; 30- Am. and Eng. Ency. of-Law (2 Ed.), p. 1264; O ’Keefe v. St. Francis Church, 59 Conn. 567; DeMattos v. Jordan, 15…
1Opinion of the CourtGOODEi, J.
Defendant Schaffner contracted to erect a house for plaintiff for $5800 by December 1, 1906. The work on the house progressed to a certain stage until December first, when Schaffner quit work, he testified, because he had no money to pay for labor or material and claiming plaintiff had not paid him the installments of the price as agreed. Schaffner notified plaintiff he would not complete the house and abandoned the contract, so the jury must have found under the instruction about what facts would authorize a verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff then took charge of the job and completed it, he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- O'Keefe v. Corporation of St. Francis's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- De Mattos v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- George A. Fuller Co. v. DoyleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oden Const. Co. v. HELTONMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Church of Immaculate Conception v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Joblin v. Illinois Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Savannah Lighting Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.