Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1924No. 3917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

The parties to this suit were plaintiff and defendant, respectively below, and shall be referred to in this opinion as such.

Prior to, on, and subsequent to, July 9, 1917, plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, was operating a line of railway known as the Cincinnati Southern Railway from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Chattanooga, Tenn., and on said date of July 9, entered into a contract with the Sheahan Construction Corporation for the building of a track 6s/10 miles in length between Helenwood and Robbins, in the state of Tennessee.

Defendant executed a bond in the sum of $20,000 on said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Valente v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. O'Keefe v. Corporation of St. Francis's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Michaelis v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Meredith v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re Kostohris' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Oden Const. Co. v. HELTONMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. United States v. NaughtenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
  5. Groene v. KostohrisMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API