Legal Opinion

De Mattos v. Jordan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1896No. 1727PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.— Hon. John R. Winn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court- was delivered by

Anders, J.

On April 30, 1890, the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant Jordan whereby the latter agreed to furnish all material and to erect for the former, in the city of New Whatcom, a three-story and basement brick and stone building, in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by one W. A. Ritchie, supervising architect, and which were made a part of the contract. By the terms of the contract, the building was to be completed on or before August 30, and in default thereof the said contractor agreed to pay the owner $50 as and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Dorsey v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Howard County v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Hayden v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bell v. PaulNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Zindorf Construction Co. v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Stephens v. ElverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Victoria Lumber Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Drumheller v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API