Legal Opinion

Gelman v. Department of Education

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 3, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-Z-1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WEINSHIENK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Miriam Gelman, brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 against defendants Department of Education, Terrel H. Bell, Secretary of Education, and Arthur Hardwick, regional administrator of the Office of Student Financial Assistance of the Department of Education (OSFA). Alleging that she was hired in December, 1978, as a collection agent for OSFA, and that the duties of OSFA collection agents were changed about two months thereafter, plaintiff asserts that the increased manual tasks exacerbated her degenerative disease, rheumatoid arthritis.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Patton Ex Rel. Lewis v. DumpsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Charles Moreno, Cross-Appellee v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Goebel v. Colorado Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Glanz v. VernickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Glanz v. VernickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  5. Penney v. Town of MiddletonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API